<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full frame Vs. APS-C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/</link>
	<description>Some things techy, some things photographic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steffanharries</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>steffanharries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-62</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-60&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-60&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ron&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any portrait photographer (which I am not) will tell the main advantage of a full frame sensor is the shallow DOF. Any portrait photog is going to prefer a full frame, not a cropper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For depth of field...possibly however most portrait photographers will use a crop body as it can save money on expensive telephoto lenses due to the 1.6x crop factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-60"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-60" rel="nofollow">Ron</a> :</strong></p>
<p>Any portrait photographer (which I am not) will tell the main advantage of a full frame sensor is the shallow DOF. Any portrait photog is going to prefer a full frame, not a cropper.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For depth of field&#8230;possibly however most portrait photographers will use a crop body as it can save money on expensive telephoto lenses due to the 1.6x crop factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equine Photography Equipment Part 1 &#171; Four Winds Photography&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Equine Photography Equipment Part 1 &#171; Four Winds Photography&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] x 36 mm.  There is an excellent discussion and explanation of this subject at Cambridge Colour.  This blog, Steff&#8217;s, also has a brief discussion of it,  An oversimplification is that a cropped sensor camera, by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] x 36 mm.  There is an excellent discussion and explanation of this subject at Cambridge Colour.  This blog, Steff&#8217;s, also has a brief discussion of it,  An oversimplification is that a cropped sensor camera, by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Any portrait photographer (which I am not) will tell the main advantage of a full frame sensor is the shallow DOF. Any portrait photog is going to prefer a full frame, not a cropper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any portrait photographer (which I am not) will tell the main advantage of a full frame sensor is the shallow DOF. Any portrait photog is going to prefer a full frame, not a cropper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tha Trackback &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full frame Vs. APS-C « Steff&#39;s Photo Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Tha Trackback &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Full frame Vs. APS-C « Steff&#39;s Photo Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Found this interesting post today, here is a quick excerpt of it: However if you shoot landscapes, low light or architecture you&#8217;re more likely to be need a full frame sensor…if you can afford it! Tags: APS-C, full frame, Photography. Comments (1) Trackbacks (1) Leave a comment Trackback &#8230; Read the rest of this great post Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Found this interesting post today, here is a quick excerpt of it: However if you shoot landscapes, low light or architecture you&#8217;re more likely to be need a full frame sensor…if you can afford it! Tags: APS-C, full frame, Photography. Comments (1) Trackbacks (1) Leave a comment Trackback &#8230; Read the rest of this great post Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY escort service</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>NY escort service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-22</guid>
		<description>It was rather interesting for me to read the article. Thank you for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read more soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was rather interesting for me to read the article. Thank you for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read more soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelli Garner</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Really nice posts.  I will be checking back here regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really nice posts.  I will be checking back here regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bits &#38; Bobs &#171; Aber Photography Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.steffanharries.com/2009/09/04/full-frame-vs-aps-c/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Bits &#38; Bobs &#171; Aber Photography Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 04:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steffanharries.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] but not least I can&#8217;t help but plug something I wrote the other day about Full Frame Vs. APS-C. I tried not to get into too much detail because I could go on and on and on and on&#8230;you get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but not least I can&#8217;t help but plug something I wrote the other day about Full Frame Vs. APS-C. I tried not to get into too much detail because I could go on and on and on and on&#8230;you get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
